Audio and Electronics Discuss in-car entertainment systems, audio and video systems, car alarms and other electronics topics.

Sub Enclosure, need advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2010, 10:32 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Domf3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 219
Sub Enclosure, need advice

I'm trying pick a sealed box for my JL 12w6v2 sub.

JL's site lists these sealed box specs:
1.25 cu. ft. / 18 in. x 14 in. x 12.75 in.

Does that mean the box has 1.25 cu. ft. empty? (BEFORE the sub is installed?)

I'm looking at a pre built (3/4" MDF) scosche se12 enclosure. Volume is listed at 1.25 cu. ft. I was going to build my own but I like this enclosure for its angled back so it sits against the back seat. It has good reviews what do you think? Same volume so it'll sound the same right?
Domf3 is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 05:20 PM
  #2  
Newbie - Just Registered
 
qu8storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5
I switched to a ported box and the difference is night and day. The bass is so much better, if i were you I would go ported. I was one that said that I wanted a seal box but now I'm glad I went ported. TRUST ME......
qu8storm is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 08:13 AM
  #3  
§è~® f®ÈÄk
iTrader: (56)
 
nismos14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 17,511
1.25 after displacement.
nismos14 is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 08:24 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
mightyMax95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 983
sealed=best and clearest sound; ported=good sound/little more bass; bandpass=muffled sound quality, TONS of bass!

box design is more important than most people realize and there's tons to be researched on the topic. it's all in what you want. the way my box is designed my 10" sub sounds amazing inside the vehicle but you don't hear it much outside of the car. that's all i need.

if it's just for YOUR listening pleasure, sealed with recomended air space. if you NEED everyone else to hear your stuff (which i personally find annoying and hate), ported or bandpass. should also mention, if space is an issue, you're going to get the most compact enclosures in a sealed format.

Last edited by mightyMax95; 05-04-2010 at 08:27 AM.
mightyMax95 is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 01:58 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
AscendantMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,619
all bandpasses arent completely muffled though, i've heard a few bandpasses that were done right...and actually sounded pretty decent.
AscendantMax is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 07:56 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
mightyMax95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 983
Originally Posted by AscendantMax
all bandpasses arent completely muffled though, i've heard a few bandpasses that were done right...and actually sounded pretty decent.
you're right of course. however, this is all about sound waves and different sub sizes give you a slightly different sound. an 8" is crisper as it can move more quickly (most OEM systems w/ sub have ~6"); a 12" on the other hand is better for those deeper lows as it moves more air with each cycle. i find a 10" to be a pleasant compromise, but that's just me.

a properly tuned bandpass designed for a 12", for example, can sound just as good as a 12" in a sealed box, because at this point you're into big bass and are just moving a lot of air.

10" and smaller are more for sound, giving you more of that extra little oomph, than straight-up heart-stopping goodness.
mightyMax95 is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 10:41 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
AscendantMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,619
an 8 won't necessarily sound crisper than a 12. the sub's size doesn't really affect its cone speed. most subs today are designed with very strong motors, so the size of the cone is almost negligible.

but yes you're right about the larger cone is able to accentuate the lower freq better than smaller drivers.
AscendantMax is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 12:00 AM
  #8  
Member
 
mjhuffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 208
I would just build one based on the JL specs and you will get the best results. Remember when building to calculate the thickness of the 3/4 inch mdf. The measurements are the outside of the box and the volume is without the sub (JL always measures their enclosures in gross amount (before sub installation)).
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-lp4SSUa..._building.html
here is a good tutorial.
You can save a good amount of money. You can also play around with the dimensions and keep the volume the same but make it wider and shallower (just make sure you maintain a good mounting depth). Best of luck. I recommend sealed too. It is a lot cleaner sounding and saves a good amount of space. This may just be my opinion by i think sealed subs last longer because they are not battling against the air pressure.
mjhuffer is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 12:51 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
AscendantMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,619
Originally Posted by mjhuffer
This may just be my opinion by i think sealed subs last longer because they are not battling against the air pressure.
actually it's "battling" quite a bit of pressure inside a sealed box.

sealed boxes are a little more forgiving on power handling though, which can definately affect the longevity of the sub.
AscendantMax is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 01:34 PM
  #10  
Chocolate_Boi_1Der
iTrader: (52)
 
Cant_Get_Ryte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: P.G.'s Finest
Posts: 2,591
Sup ascendant, long time no "see"


you can build a quality ported enclosure that will be more efficient on power handling, provide higher output, as well as be able to play as low as you desire (Although you will more than likely give up a little VOLUME to tune lower.


What types of music do you listen to, how much space do you want to give up, how much power do you have on hand? THose are the most important questions.

If your lookin for a decent amount of output without giving up the entire trunk then stick with what you have. If you feel that the sub in that enclosure needs a little bit more room, you can always just stuff the box with polyfill.
Cant_Get_Ryte is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 11:50 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
AscendantMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,619
Originally Posted by Cant_Get_Ryte
Sup ascendant, long time no "see"


you can build a quality ported enclosure that will be more efficient on power handling, provide higher output, as well as be able to play as low as you desire (Although you will more than likely give up a little VOLUME to tune lower.


What types of music do you listen to, how much space do you want to give up, how much power do you have on hand? THose are the most important questions.

If your lookin for a decent amount of output without giving up the entire trunk then stick with what you have. If you feel that the sub in that enclosure needs a little bit more room, you can always just stuff the box with polyfill.


and holy crap dude, it's been a long time! how ya been?
AscendantMax is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 06:07 AM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Domf3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 219
Argh. I'm conflicted.
My setup:
Pioneer 780mp head unit
DLS UP6 Comps up front amp'd by alpine pdx 2.150
Stock rears
Alpine MRD M501 digital sub amp. (550 watt rms)

The 12w6v2 is currently in a ported box. I bought it that way off an auction site. I tried measuring and it looks a little smaller than JL's spec ported box. I think I'll just go ahead and build the sealed box to spec and see how it sounds. What I'm looking for:
-'Tighter' bass. More 'punch'. Smoother mid bass transition. Not too concerned about loud i just want it to blend better, ALL about sq not spl. I have 55o RMS so I think I'm good for the sealed. The ported box looks beautiful, slot port and 'close' to spec BUT I'm itching to hear it sealed. Just sucks that I'll most likely toss the ported box, not really worth anything right?
Domf3 is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 06:11 AM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Domf3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 219
Do you guys recommend the JL spec 1.25 cu. ft. for 'Punch' and smooth mid bass transition? I'll most likely have it built in a week or 2 then report results. I used to love 'loud'. Must be getting old because now I want 'accurate'.

I listen mostly to alternative and rock. I'll listen to stuff like black eyed peas and other hip hop/rap but not as often.

Last edited by Domf3; 05-06-2010 at 06:16 AM.
Domf3 is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 12:35 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
AscendantMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,619
yep, i would go ahead and do a sealed box then if you're not too concerned with output.
AscendantMax is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 05:39 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
WhiteMaxima9600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,066
go with sealed then like ascendant mentioned.
WhiteMaxima9600 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gigabyte
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
8
01-06-2017 06:05 PM
Pnjboyzz
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
2
11-16-2015 12:27 PM
Mahmuth
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
2
10-17-2015 12:03 PM
JakeOfAllTrades
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
6
10-05-2015 10:40 AM
dshinn
General Maxima Discussion
0
09-26-2015 08:07 PM



Quick Reply: Sub Enclosure, need advice



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:20 AM.