Opinion on Arc Audio
06-03-2008, 05:46 PM
#1
Opinion on Arc Audio
Can I please get some opinions on the Arc Audio FL12 D2/D4. What do you guys think of these subs? Right now I don't know exactly what I want except that I want a sealed enclosure. Going for SQ instead of SPL. I'm also looking at the Rainbow Vanadium line of Subs. Any comments?? Thanx.
06-03-2008, 07:20 PM
#4
Yeah, I know Don has the Rainbows. I was sort of leaning that way. I just don't wanna give him anymore money.
I'll be broke b4 the summer is over
. I don't wanna go too big. I don't want such a huge box that it takes me more than a few minutes to take it out of the trunk by myself. Just in case I have to use all of my trunk, I.E. family rides to the beach or where ever we may go. Do you think the 8's or 10's will be enough?
I'll be broke b4 the summer is over. I don't wanna go too big. I don't want such a huge box that it takes me more than a few minutes to take it out of the trunk by myself. Just in case I have to use all of my trunk, I.E. family rides to the beach or where ever we may go. Do you think the 8's or 10's will be enough?
Last edited by ICEMAN76; 06-03-2008 at 07:42 PM.
06-03-2008, 07:49 PM
#5
I was also thinking about the FI Q's. I have been getting some pretty good reviews on them. Anyone else besides Filtor1 running FI's??
Last edited by ICEMAN76; 06-03-2008 at 08:14 PM.
06-03-2008, 08:13 PM
#6
I tend to get a bit irritable
iTrader: (151)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 17,674
The FL has been good to me while I ran a pair, although I did favor the IDMAXs for overall tonality. However the FL was designed and will accept more abuse with no adverse consequence. Throwing the Vanadium in the mix will lack a bit in output ( NOT Substantially as some would think) and would surely take the cake for the best of the bunch sound wise. Compared to the cost of my previous and current sub, the Profi and Vanadiums will remain some of my favorites.
06-03-2008, 08:47 PM
#14
don't get the Fi Q. trust me, the SQ is wayyyyyyyyyy over-hyped (sorry chris)
it's not bad, but you would be better off with the two choices you listed first who's product is geared towards SQ. to me the Fi Q is just a solid street beater sub that will handle a bit of power with decent SQ.
it's not bad, but you would be better off with the two choices you listed first who's product is geared towards SQ. to me the Fi Q is just a solid street beater sub that will handle a bit of power with decent SQ.
Last edited by AscendantMax; 06-03-2008 at 08:49 PM.
06-03-2008, 09:04 PM
#17
don't get the Fi Q. trust me, the SQ is wayyyyyyyyyy over-hyped (sorry chris)
it's not bad, but you would be better off with the two choices you listed first who's product is geared towards SQ. to me the Fi Q is just a solid street beater sub that will handle a bit of power with decent SQ.
it's not bad, but you would be better off with the two choices you listed first who's product is geared towards SQ. to me the Fi Q is just a solid street beater sub that will handle a bit of power with decent SQ.
. Hopefully i can hold out for a while.
Last edited by ICEMAN76; 06-03-2008 at 09:13 PM.
06-03-2008, 09:38 PM
#18
don't get the Fi Q. trust me, the SQ is wayyyyyyyyyy over-hyped (sorry chris)
it's not bad, but you would be better off with the two choices you listed first who's product is geared towards SQ. to me the Fi Q is just a solid street beater sub that will handle a bit of power with decent SQ.
it's not bad, but you would be better off with the two choices you listed first who's product is geared towards SQ. to me the Fi Q is just a solid street beater sub that will handle a bit of power with decent SQ.
BTW, Elemental Design is.. or was having a sale on their 12in D4 subs, i believe 60 bucks a piece..
06-05-2008, 07:51 PM
#22
Thanks alot guys for all the info and opinions. I'll probably be doing 2 8's or 10's in a fiberglass enclosure. Hopefully I can get the SQ i'm looking for with this setup. Thanks again guys, wish me luck. Hey Don, when is the next GD on subs? LOL.
06-05-2008, 08:03 PM
#23
don't get the Fi Q. trust me, the SQ is wayyyyyyyyyy over-hyped (sorry chris)
it's not bad, but you would be better off with the two choices you listed first who's product is geared towards SQ. to me the Fi Q is just a solid street beater sub that will handle a bit of power with decent SQ.
it's not bad, but you would be better off with the two choices you listed first who's product is geared towards SQ. to me the Fi Q is just a solid street beater sub that will handle a bit of power with decent SQ.
06-06-2008, 08:29 AM
#25
For 90% of the audio community, the Q will suffice. Most people that get in my car just want to see how loud it is. They don't care about SQ, regarless what they say. Most wouldn't be able to distinguish between two drivers with similar output and SQ capabilities. For the DIY or distinguishing audiophile who desires straight SQ, More is required. There are tradeoffs with respect to each. Design your system to meet your needs and you will be fine.
06-06-2008, 08:58 AM
#27
Give me one good reason why your approach is the best?
06-06-2008, 09:03 AM
#28
06-06-2008, 09:22 AM
#32
You have no proof of your claim. T/A and phase shift will take car of that, and it's STILL non-directional. A sub does not physically have to be in front of you for upfront bass.
Last edited by nismos14; 06-06-2008 at 09:25 AM.
06-06-2008, 09:44 AM
#33
i like my trunk space. 
maybe i'll throw it back in one of these days...
yep a lot of people were impressed with it's output when i demo'ed at this audio shop. they loved how a single ported 12 was flexing my rear window and roof! 
maybe i'll throw it back in one of these days...
Originally Posted by filtor1
No reason to appologize bro. I would happen to agree with your assesment. It is definitely a solid daily sub. There are a ton of subs that sound better but lack the output I like. Just b/c it was a fit for me doesn't mean it is a fit for everyone
Originally Posted by nismos14
Bass is non-directional
06-06-2008, 10:01 AM
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 236
That said, nothing wrong with 8s up front regardless
06-06-2008, 12:11 PM
#36
There should be only one sub, not two. Stereo is 2.1, meaning a left channel, a right channel, and a subwoofer. (the .1 is for the sub). And everything should be in front of you, like at a concert. Yeah time alignment can help a little, and having a sub in the back isn't as bad as having mids/highs in the back like with rear speakers; but ideally you shouldn't be surrounded by any sound when listening to music. I may be a newb when it comes to installation and some of the complex stuff with tweaking settings, but I know some ****. =)
Last edited by ElVito1981; 06-06-2008 at 12:14 PM.
06-06-2008, 12:55 PM
#39
I tend to get a bit irritable
iTrader: (151)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 17,674
There should be only one sub, not two. Stereo is 2.1, meaning a left channel, a right channel, and a subwoofer. (the .1 is for the sub). And everything should be in front of you, like at a concert. Yeah time alignment can help a little, and having a sub in the back isn't as bad as having mids/highs in the back like with rear speakers; but ideally you shouldn't be surrounded by any sound when listening to music. I may be a newb when it comes to installation and some of the complex stuff with tweaking settings, but I know some ****. =)