Cattman 3" Catback Exhaust - Order Here!
#41
Can you be more specific in what you're responding/referring to please...
Pretty please... anyone?
#42
Let's see...
First, the bad news. I went through all older orders to confirm, and 2 orders (the oldest two) have cancelled, so we need 3 (preferably 4) to make this deal fly. It looks like there might be some momentum here, so I'm still optimistic.
2. Shipping do Dallas is either $66 or $78, I'd have to check your zip code. Oh, and we're in AZ, not TX.
3. Don't mean to contradict anyone, but OH YES there would be a reduction in price if we sold 20 of these suckers. Heck, I'll reduce the price by $25/unit if we get 15 orders, and $50/unit if we get 25.
4. I won't get involved in the backpressure discussion except to note that, all other things being equal (in terms of engine performance), the exhaust velocity has to decrease anytime the tubing diameter is increased so I don't see how that would - in and of itself - be a negative indicator. [Try narrowing it to 1", I'll bet the gasses really scoot!] But seriously, of course there is a point where a lack of backpressure will negatively impact engine performance, but I don't know how, or at what point, the degree of exhaust velocity loss would correlate with the "tipping point" of performance starting to decline.
Brian
First, the bad news. I went through all older orders to confirm, and 2 orders (the oldest two) have cancelled, so we need 3 (preferably 4) to make this deal fly. It looks like there might be some momentum here, so I'm still optimistic.
2. Shipping do Dallas is either $66 or $78, I'd have to check your zip code. Oh, and we're in AZ, not TX.
3. Don't mean to contradict anyone, but OH YES there would be a reduction in price if we sold 20 of these suckers. Heck, I'll reduce the price by $25/unit if we get 15 orders, and $50/unit if we get 25.
4. I won't get involved in the backpressure discussion except to note that, all other things being equal (in terms of engine performance), the exhaust velocity has to decrease anytime the tubing diameter is increased so I don't see how that would - in and of itself - be a negative indicator. [Try narrowing it to 1", I'll bet the gasses really scoot!] But seriously, of course there is a point where a lack of backpressure will negatively impact engine performance, but I don't know how, or at what point, the degree of exhaust velocity loss would correlate with the "tipping point" of performance starting to decline.
Brian
#45
won't get involved in the backpressure discussion except to note that, all other things being equal (in terms of engine performance), the exhaust velocity has to decrease anytime the tubing diameter is increased so I don't see how that would - in and of itself - be a negative indicator. [Try narrowing it to 1", I'll bet the gasses really scoot!] But seriously, of course there is a point where a lack of backpressure will negatively impact engine performance, but I don't know how, or at what point, the degree of exhaust velocity loss would correlate with the "tipping point" of performance starting to decline.
Brian
Thanks Brian for the price reduction possibilities that sounds awesome if we had that many interested....I spoke to "The Law" he had nothing but good things to say regarding this 3" exhaust system! I was able to see that Sactown YouTube video while cruisin the freeway and again I was really impressed with the low noise output in the "famous drone zone"! Maybe this is the missing link along with the TS reflash....I don't know....I'll be weighing the - & + aspects and you'll get a call about what direction I'm gonna go! If I was the only person in the equation I would have had one during the first ordering/mfg session! But I have a wife that actually drives the car more than I do....And this is our highway car going to Louisiana quite often so I'm really trying to see what kinda behavior the 3" exhaust exhibits cause the 2.5" with headers was too loud for my Wife's and I taste that's why I reinstalled the Oem trick muffler.....(Yall probably think I'm a *****)...so let me think a little and I pray that I can make a really good decision...
Brian thanks for making products that are so beautiful I can't sleep at night...
CMax03 (Carlton)
Brian
Thanks Brian for the price reduction possibilities that sounds awesome if we had that many interested....I spoke to "The Law" he had nothing but good things to say regarding this 3" exhaust system! I was able to see that Sactown YouTube video while cruisin the freeway and again I was really impressed with the low noise output in the "famous drone zone"! Maybe this is the missing link along with the TS reflash....I don't know....I'll be weighing the - & + aspects and you'll get a call about what direction I'm gonna go! If I was the only person in the equation I would have had one during the first ordering/mfg session! But I have a wife that actually drives the car more than I do....And this is our highway car going to Louisiana quite often so I'm really trying to see what kinda behavior the 3" exhaust exhibits cause the 2.5" with headers was too loud for my Wife's and I taste that's why I reinstalled the Oem trick muffler.....(Yall probably think I'm a *****)...so let me think a little and I pray that I can make a really good decision...
Brian thanks for making products that are so beautiful I can't sleep at night...
CMax03 (Carlton)
#47
as for back pressure, my friends 5.7L LS1 camaro has true dual 2.5" exhaust. If you do the math its 5" of exhaust diameter for 5.7 liters of displacement, compare that to 3" of diameter for 3.5 liters of displacement. That means he has .877 inches of exhaust diameter per liter of displacement, and giving our cars .857 inches of exhaust diameter per liter. In short he has less back pressure. Yet 2.5" duals is considered optimal for making power for camaro guys.
#48
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 3,468
as for back pressure, my friends 5.7L LS1 camaro has true dual 2.5" exhaust. If you do the math its 5" of exhaust diameter for 5.7 liters of displacement, compare that to 3" of diameter for 3.5 liters of displacement. That means he has .877 inches of exhaust diameter per liter of displacement, and giving our cars .857 inches of exhaust diameter per liter. In short he has less back pressure. Yet 2.5" duals is considered optimal for making power for camaro guys.
#49
Well I'm goin to say this...
"IF" we can get these numbers right count me in!!! Jus pm me what I need to do... hell... I want the 45 bux shippin too, lol...
But folks like was said before... why not jump on board... hell I think even if u don't like it... I'm sure u can resell it for what u bought it for new-used if not more...
I'm looking at it like this... it jus means I won't end up spending 750 on some burgers this year... rotfl... hell its helping my diet on me not jus me car...
Also, I don't have headers yet... what should I pair this exhaust wit?!?
I'm excited... lol... I want a beast not a pony... so I'm goin to tk the needed measures to achieve it...
"IF" we can get these numbers right count me in!!! Jus pm me what I need to do... hell... I want the 45 bux shippin too, lol...
But folks like was said before... why not jump on board... hell I think even if u don't like it... I'm sure u can resell it for what u bought it for new-used if not more...
I'm looking at it like this... it jus means I won't end up spending 750 on some burgers this year... rotfl... hell its helping my diet on me not jus me car...
Also, I don't have headers yet... what should I pair this exhaust wit?!?
I'm excited... lol... I want a beast not a pony... so I'm goin to tk the needed measures to achieve it...
#51
After watching numerous videos that The Law posted on YOU TUBE and loving the look but very skeptical about the exhaust volume @ low speed such as in the drive by #1-3... and maybe a little quieter than the 2.5" during the 3 In-Cabin videos (highway speeds)....I'm trying to decide If this is gonna be the best route for me at this time....The sound is awesome, the numbers @ wot are awesome, but in slow moving traffic, I don't wanna be that loud, obnoxious, nor annoying guy....I think most of you call that RICEY! It appears to me that the 3" is a little louder than the 2.5"! Is that correct? Any N/A's guys out there upgraded from a Cattman 2.5" to a Cattman 3.0" catback? Please PM me or reply to this question...Please!!!
#52
won't get involved in the backpressure discussion except to note that, all other things being equal (in terms of engine performance), the exhaust velocity has to decrease anytime the tubing diameter is increased so I don't see how that would - in and of itself - be a negative indicator. [Try narrowing it to 1", I'll bet the gasses really scoot!] But seriously, of course there is a point where a lack of backpressure will negatively impact engine performance, but I don't know how, or at what point, the degree of exhaust velocity loss would correlate with the "tipping point" of performance starting to decline.
Brian
Thanks Brian for the price reduction possibilities that sounds awesome if we had that many interested....I spoke to "The Law" he had nothing but good things to say regarding this 3" exhaust system! I was able to see that Sactown YouTube video while cruisin the freeway and again I was really impressed with the low noise output in the "famous drone zone"! Maybe this is the missing link along with the TS reflash....I don't know....I'll be weighing the - & + aspects and you'll get a call about what direction I'm gonna go! If I was the only person in the equation I would have had one during the first ordering/mfg session! But I have a wife that actually drives the car more than I do....And this is our highway car going to Louisiana quite often so I'm really trying to see what kinda behavior the 3" exhaust exhibits cause the 2.5" with headers was too loud for my Wife's and I taste that's why I reinstalled the Oem trick muffler.....(Yall probably think I'm a *****)...so let me think a little and I pray that I can make a really good decision...
Brian thanks for making products that are so beautiful I can't sleep at night...
CMax03 (Carlton)
Brian
Thanks Brian for the price reduction possibilities that sounds awesome if we had that many interested....I spoke to "The Law" he had nothing but good things to say regarding this 3" exhaust system! I was able to see that Sactown YouTube video while cruisin the freeway and again I was really impressed with the low noise output in the "famous drone zone"! Maybe this is the missing link along with the TS reflash....I don't know....I'll be weighing the - & + aspects and you'll get a call about what direction I'm gonna go! If I was the only person in the equation I would have had one during the first ordering/mfg session! But I have a wife that actually drives the car more than I do....And this is our highway car going to Louisiana quite often so I'm really trying to see what kinda behavior the 3" exhaust exhibits cause the 2.5" with headers was too loud for my Wife's and I taste that's why I reinstalled the Oem trick muffler.....(Yall probably think I'm a *****)...so let me think a little and I pray that I can make a really good decision...
Brian thanks for making products that are so beautiful I can't sleep at night...
CMax03 (Carlton)
#54
as for back pressure, my friends 5.7L LS1 camaro has true dual 2.5" exhaust. If you do the math its 5" of exhaust diameter for 5.7 liters of displacement, compare that to 3" of diameter for 3.5 liters of displacement. That means he has .877 inches of exhaust diameter per liter of displacement, and giving our cars .857 inches of exhaust diameter per liter. In short he has less back pressure. Yet 2.5" duals is considered optimal for making power for camaro guys.
I don't mean to be contrary, but you can't add or compare diameters like that; you have to calculate area first. A Maxima with a single 3" exhaust actually has a higher ratio of engine displacement to cross-sectional exhaust area (2.01 sq in/litre) than the Camaro you mention (just 1.72 sq in litre).
And that doesn't take into account the increased efficiency of the single 3" system's lower tube wall area to volume ratio - meaning far less tube wall friction and a lower rate of heat loss, both of which increase flow efficiency and performance beyond the cross-sectional advantage.
Brian
#55
as for back pressure, my friends 5.7L LS1 camaro has true dual 2.5" exhaust. If you do the math its 5" of exhaust diameter for 5.7 liters of displacement, compare that to 3" of diameter for 3.5 liters of displacement. That means he has .877 inches of exhaust diameter per liter of displacement, and giving our cars .857 inches of exhaust diameter per liter. In short he has less back pressure. Yet 2.5" duals is considered optimal for making power for camaro guys.
#57
just an FYI: a 5" pipe has an area of 20.01 in^2 while a 2.5" pipe has a 4.87 in^2 area... Definitely not the same....
ahh, getting paid to be a dork for a living, gotta love it
ahh, getting paid to be a dork for a living, gotta love it
#62
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 744
so i have a Cattman Y, straight pipe, and GReddy evo2 cat-back.
will this hook right up to the straight pipe, or will I need some sort of reducer type straight pipe to go between this 3" cat-back and the y-pipe?
will this hook right up to the straight pipe, or will I need some sort of reducer type straight pipe to go between this 3" cat-back and the y-pipe?
#64
I assume so, worse case some muffler shop would just weld them together, But I doubt cattman (as good as they are) would leave any room for the slightest mistake, it's prob a direct fit.
#65
I don't know if it will be better leaving the header collector going into a cat of the same size or dumping off into a larger cat the same size as the catback?
#66
I want to change some car parts,but I donot know what is good or is bad,I search some information at sourcinggate.com and ebay.com,eg car dvd player.
who can compare with these?
who can compare with these?
#68
There is a thread where you can ask that question and i am sure you will get whatever information you want by just searching around the forums. Anyway, hopefully Brian gets more orders in and start production because i placed an order a month ago.
#69
Play with my balls
Thread Starter
iTrader: (151)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,542
To answer the relevant question above, the flanges of the 3" exhaust is designed to fit either your stock, fastcat, or aftermarket converter. I believe the rear section is the same as well regarding the design of the flange to fit the stock or aftermarket b-pipe, but I know that it will fit a 2.5" cat outlet.
#71
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 744
To answer the relevant question above, the flanges of the 3" exhaust is designed to fit either your stock, fastcat, or aftermarket converter. I believe the rear section is the same as well regarding the design of the flange to fit the stock or aftermarket b-pipe, but I know that it will fit a 2.5" cat outlet.
#72
I'm srry, either some ppl have never ever modded a car before or something cause I can see why some question is being asked but there are some that just leaves me to think ppl have no common sense my goodness is it really that bad at times???............. hey I got a question, I bought some gas for my car, do you think I should press the trigger on the pumps nozzle or is there a better way of gettn the gas out???.... my goodness ppl... cmon man... matter of fact stop wrecking the OP's thread.... he is looking for orders for this 3" catback system, if u don't know about the catback system and the pro's and cons then maybe you shouldn't be buying it.... go search damn it
#73
Information before modding is part of being prepared when you really have a plan.....I never have gone into any modification blind....That's why my ride is still rolling and not seating in someones shop....And for your info I've been asking questions concerning this 3" catback for over a year and I really haven't got a real good solid answer yet!!!! That's kinda scary that no one has a real good description of the total operation of this system in WOT nor part throttle, street mannerism nor driveable in real deep detail....
Last edited by CMax03; 02-01-2010 at 09:46 PM.
#74
I don't think anyone is disputing the gains you get when you romp on it with the 3" exhaust, just voicing concerns about how easy it is to life with the rest of the time. Nor is anyone knocking the quality or the fit of the exhaust that I know of so it doesn't seem to be a slap at Brian, but rather trying to make an informed decision.
#77
I think what he is trying to determine is if any low speed throttle response changes or added noise is worth the WOT gains. 95% of the time, most of us are driving in traffic and tip in throttle response is important, along with a reasonable noise level.
I don't think anyone is disputing the gains you get when you romp on it with the 3" exhaust, just voicing concerns about how easy it is to life with the rest of the time. Nor is anyone knocking the quality or the fit of the exhaust that I know of so it doesn't seem to be a slap at Brian, but rather trying to make an informed decision.
I don't think anyone is disputing the gains you get when you romp on it with the 3" exhaust, just voicing concerns about how easy it is to life with the rest of the time. Nor is anyone knocking the quality or the fit of the exhaust that I know of so it doesn't seem to be a slap at Brian, but rather trying to make an informed decision.
#78
Well Cattman's products are worth every freakin penny...I'm an orger who's is a strong Cattman supporter/customer for over ten years now...you get more than you pay for...Look around at equivalent quality products of this cailber and they'll charge you a arm and leg and ur first born plus rape u, ur wife, ur Mom and ur Dad...with no lube!!!!! If this was a B&B exhaust system I'd cost us about $1800....
It's a free world buy what you want, from whom ever you want, but u don't have to be a straight-up hater!!!.....
Move to another type car maybe a Sonata...you won't have to worry about Brian building any over priced performance parts for those!!!
It's a free world buy what you want, from whom ever you want, but u don't have to be a straight-up hater!!!.....
Move to another type car maybe a Sonata...you won't have to worry about Brian building any over priced performance parts for those!!!
#79
Play with my balls
Thread Starter
iTrader: (151)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,542
I challenge you to find me the same products produced by Cattman, "of the exact same caliber or higher" manufactured by a competitor for less money. If you can bring that to the table with sufficient proof, I will personally paypal you $100.
#80
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 3,468
Information before modding is part of being prepared when you really have a plan.....I never have gone into any modification blind....That's why my ride is still rolling and not seating in someones shop....And for your info I've been asking questions concerning this 3" catback for over a year and I really haven't got a real good solid answer yet!!!! That's kinda scary that no one has a real good description of the total operation of this system in WOT nor part throttle, street mannerism nor driveable in real deep detail....
The Law has posted videos of how it sounds at partial throttle and different RPMs. That's as much of the street manerism as you need to know, as even at partial throttle plugging your exhaust with a potato (TO INCREASE BACK PRESSURE, YO) will not gain you power.
So here you go, a 3" will increase power throughout the RPM band and back pressure is a joke. Got it?
Let me also put it this way. I gain part throttle power and responsiveness from driving around with open Y-pipe, no cat-back even attached. That stands to reason there is enough "back pressure" (lol) with just headers to save the world from blowing up, lowend power from being lost, and my exhaust valves from burning.
Last edited by sparks03max; 02-02-2010 at 06:50 AM.