4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

9004 to 9007 Conversion Output Photos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2010, 10:01 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
nalc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ / Hoboken, NJ
Posts: 1,325
9004 to 9007 Conversion Output Photos

Hi folks,

There is a lot of buzz about the 9007 conversion.

Stock 3rd and 4th gens both use 9004 bulbs. The 9004 is a dual tranverse filament bulb with a 45w low beam and a 65w high beam. It's rated for a 700 lm lowbeam and a 1200 lm highbeam.

The 9007 is a dual axial filament bulb with a 55w low beam and a 65w high beam, rated for 1000 lm and 1350 lm, respectively.

There are plenty of threads with photos of this conversion, including a how-to. I will not attempt to replicate that. It's in the stickies already.

What is lacking is any detailed A/B tests of them. There's probably a hundred down-the-road camera shots showing how "bright" a 9007 is. Automotive lighting is very difficult to photograph, and really can only be accurately represented by a true photometric test. Since I don't have one of those sitting in my closet, this is probably the best that can be done.

My tests are done against a white wall. This removes any artificial coloring from the beam. They are all from the same headlight, a Nissan factory 99 left side headlight. The headlight is exactly 20 feet away from the wall. Ambient light has been minimized, and is consistent from photo to photo. The bulbs are powered off of a regulated 12v power supply, so there is no voltage fluctuations from picture to picture. The camera is at the exact same spot every time, and it is on manual settings at a very low exposure, so the beam is not washed out. All the light will look dimmer in this, but it allows you to see the hotspot more clearly.

Due to the design of my basement, I took two shots of each. One is the light pointed high up, so that you can see the width of the beam and the lower portion. The other is the light pointed level, so you can see the excess light above the hotspot (glare).

I'll let the pictures do the rest of the talking.

First, a control shot, to show ambient light levels:


9004 low


9004 high


9007 low


9007 high
nalc is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 10:02 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
nalc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ / Hoboken, NJ
Posts: 1,325
9004 low


9004 high


9007 low


9007 high
nalc is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 10:12 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
nalc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ / Hoboken, NJ
Posts: 1,325
I came in skeptical about it, and while it wasn't as bad as I expected, it really depends on your driving habits as to whether or not it is a good idea.

Although it is brighter, there is no longer a real difference between lowbeam and highbeam.

9004 gives a dim lowbeam, but it is distinctly lower than the highbeam, for reduced glare. The headlight is pretty much at the same angle in all shots, so you can see how much higher the 9004 high beam is than its low beam. Our 4th gens actually have a pretty good high beam. 9004 gives a dim lowbeam, but its fine for driving in congested or well-lit areas, and does not glare as much. The high beam is pretty wide and bright on it, so if it is super dark, just use your highbeams.

Whereas the 9007 is definitely a brighter lowbeam, it loses highbeam functionality. Going from highbeams to lowbeams there is no fundamental change in the beam pattern, just a minor change in brightness.

This means that if your lights are aimed properly for 9004, and you drop in 9007, you will be driving around with highbeams on all of the time (which is why people claim it is brighter - of course it is, you're using highbeams).

If you put in 9007s and properly aim them, then you will lose your highbeam, since they will have to be pointed more downwards. However, your lowbeam is brighter.

If you live in an area where you rarely use highbeams, then I would reccomend the 9007 conversion, provided that you aim the headlights a few degrees lower. It will definitely be a brighter lowbeam, as long as it is aimed to the correct lowbeam specifications. However, clicking your highbeams will not move the light higher, it will just make it brighter.

If you live in a very dark area, keep the 9004s. Your eyes can adjust to the dimmer light, and if you aim the lowbeam correctly, your highbeam will work correctly too, giving a very high and bright light.

If you need more light, and high-beam functionality, I recommend a HID projector retrofit.
nalc is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 12:14 PM
  #4  
Member who somehow became The President of The SE-L Club
iTrader: (19)
 
njmaxseltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 16,033
Nice thread! Glad somebody finally make that clear on here. The 9007 conversion does little if nothing at all in improving the lighting on our 4th gens. It actually makes it worse for driving as most will use high beams A LOT on the dark county roads. (myself included)

You can buy 80-100W 9004 clear bulbs at JC Whitney or just about any other performance shop. That's the best way to get your 9004 lights brighter. An upgraded harness is recommended.

Sylvania Xtravision 9004 bulbs (standard wattage) are the biggest improvement you can make while maintaining a completely stock setup.
njmaxseltd is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 12:40 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Maximeltman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,694
Good **** nicely done camparison to show the diff in 04/07...
Btw is that your garage with the couch and big flatscreen tv?
Maximeltman is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 01:35 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
defiance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA - New Joisey
Posts: 650
I agree Xtravisions are the best without upgrading your wire harness.
defiance is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 11:08 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
FallenOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Kankakee, Illinois
Posts: 1,895
Originally Posted by njmaxseltd
Nice thread! Glad somebody finally make that clear on here. The 9007 conversion does little if nothing at all in improving the lighting on our 4th gens. It actually makes it worse for driving as most will use high beams A LOT on the dark county roads. (myself included)

You can buy 80-100W 9004 clear bulbs at JC Whitney or just about any other performance shop. That's the best way to get your 9004 lights brighter. An upgraded harness is recommended.

Sylvania Xtravision 9004 bulbs (standard wattage) are the biggest improvement you can make while maintaining a completely stock setup.
I approve this message! !!!
FallenOne is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 08:34 PM
  #8  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
dragonboyokada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 166
Excellent thread! Hopefully, it'll limit all the confusion. I bought a set of 9007 but decided against the mod after reading about all the angle and pattern issues. just learned to drive in the dark.
dragonboyokada is offline  
Old 03-04-2012, 08:55 PM
  #9  
Newbie - Just Registered
 
williamjames262's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1
9004 and 9007 Bulbs
What are the differences? They look interchangeable—
but they’re not.



The 9004 (HB1) bulb, introduced in 1983, was the first halogen replaceable headlight bulb available for use in North America. It uses 12 Volts, has a 45 Watt low beam filament producing 700 lumens, and a 65 Watt high beam filament producing 1200 lumens. These filaments are transverse—if you hold the bulb upright, they run across the bulb from side to side.

The 9007 (HB5) bulb, introduced in 1992, uses 12 Volts, has a 55 Watt low beam filament producing 1000 lumens, and a 65 Watt high beam filament producing 1350 lumens. These filaments are axial—if you hold the bulb upright, they run along the bulb from top to bottom.

9004 and 9007 bulbs are keyed differently, so they can’t be interchanged, but the higher light output of the 9007 tempts some people to try making 9007 bulbs fit in headlamps designed for 9004 bulbs.

This is not an upgrade, and it’s unsafe.
It’s important to use the specified bulb.

Each headlamp is designed to use only one type of headlamp bulb. It may be a 9004, a 9007, or some other type. Headlamps are optical instruments, and they depend on the filament being very precisely oriented and placed exactly how and where it’s supposed to be, in order to form a beam pattern with the right amounts of light in the right places.

If the filament is improperly oriented or placed because the wrong kind of bulb is used, the headlamp’s optics won’t see what they’re expecting to see, and they won’t be able to do their job. The result will be a damaged beam pattern that won’t provide safe seeing light for the driver, and will cause blinding glare for other road users.


__________________________________________________ ________
hid kit | car cover
williamjames262 is offline  
Old 03-04-2012, 09:06 PM
  #10  
Got Retrofit?
iTrader: (34)
 
ChrisMan287's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 14,802
Thanks, Wikipedia.. I meant williamjames262, sorry.
ChrisMan287 is offline  
Old 03-04-2012, 09:23 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ShocknAwe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,292
lol inspector chrisman. ridding the world of plagiarizers
ShocknAwe is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 01:34 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
infinimax96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,096
Hey, at least he posted actual useful information and not just "cool" or "awesome" or went out and started a new thread asking some retarded question. Just saying...
infinimax96 is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 08:00 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
VisciousMo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SATX-HTX
Posts: 804
retro or bust!
VisciousMo is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 08:16 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
CMax03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 9,538
Originally Posted by njmaxseltd
Nice thread! Glad somebody finally make that clear on here. The 9007 conversion does little if nothing at all in improving the lighting on our 4th gens. It actually makes it worse for driving as most will use high beams A LOT on the dark county roads. (myself included)

You can buy 80-100W 9004 clear bulbs at JC Whitney or just about any other performance shop. That's the best way to get your 9004 lights brighter. An upgraded harness is recommended.

Sylvania Xtravision 9004 bulbs (standard wattage) are the biggest improvement you can make while maintaining a completely stock setup.
I like thoses inexpensive JcWhitney Bulbs....A few yrs back B4 I had my 5.5th Gen...I was always buying and comparing bulbs (H4, 9003, 9004, H3 etc) I use to be a PIAA Nut until I bought some JcWhitney Performance bulbs and did a brand to brand comparison on the truck and was really De-nutted by seeing that $75 PIAA wasn't any different in light output than some $15 JcWhitney bulbs of the same type (H4 vs H4)!!!! I'm always ordering their H3 and H4 bulbs and I guess I'll upgrade the 9004 bulbs and connectors!
CMax03 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Calabar
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
3
10-05-2015 09:57 PM
bigfrank
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
10-01-2015 12:51 PM
ivorton23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
11
09-28-2015 09:08 PM
Taino14
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
0
09-24-2015 02:51 PM
kjlouis
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
0
09-14-2015 11:22 AM



Quick Reply: 9004 to 9007 Conversion Output Photos



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:37 AM.