4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

KS not reading any resistance at all?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2007, 03:09 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
MOHFpro90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 4,717
KS not reading any resistance at all?

I have had the 0304 code for a while now. So, I decided to test the KS and see if I could see what was wrong. Well, I didnt get any reading(just Overload) on my multimeter. I tried both pins of F121, and the GND of the battery. Any ideas? Does this mean my KS is completely shot, or did I just do something wrong? I was thinking I would get an awkward ohm reading if it was bad, not just nothing.

Sorry if this is a noob question, just this isnt my category.
MOHFpro90 is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 07:44 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
vilmaxima's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London, ON, CANADA
Posts: 585
the code u r talkin about is P0304? If u used OBDII, thats a cylinder 4 misfire,
my ks sensor went bad also and noticed a heavy drop in acceleration and shifting(automatic). Maybe its a spark plug issue? Hope this helps
vilmaxima is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 08:11 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
MOHFpro90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 4,717
No, the CEL code. Its my knock sensor, I know that. Im past that. Im trying to get some help on why when I test the sensor, I get a reading of 0 ohms. Anyone?
MOHFpro90 is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 08:32 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
vilmaxima's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London, ON, CANADA
Posts: 585
knock sensor resistance is very high(use an ohmeter capable of measuring at least 10 M-ohms) check for continuity between 2 terminals of the knock sensor connector. Continuity should be indicated, if an open circuit is indicated, replace the knock sensor.
Got this from Haynes Repair Manual.
vilmaxima is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 05:10 AM
  #5  
No more Maximas...
iTrader: (26)
 
pmohr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Oak Ridge, TN
Posts: 14,331
Originally Posted by vilmaxima
knock sensor resistance is very high(use an ohmeter capable of measuring at least 10 M-ohms) check for continuity between 2 terminals of the knock sensor connector. Continuity should be indicated, if an open circuit is indicated, replace the knock sensor.
Got this from Haynes Repair Manual.


1, are you getting infinite or no resistance? i.e. 0 or 1?

What resistance range are you testing with, if not an auto-ranging DVOM? If you keep getting infinite, keep upping the test range. If you get no resistance, it's shorted somewhere, not likely internally so somewhere close. Of course, your meter could be shorted internally, too.
pmohr is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 08:52 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
UncleMax98's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 518
Only one connector pin goes to the knock sensor. The other pin is a shield wire and is not connected to the knock sensor at the end. If you measure resistance between two connector pins, you will get infinite resistance. You can measure resistance between the pin and ground. One pin should be infinite resistance. The other pin should be around 525K Ohm. Note: Could be a bad cable, too.
UncleMax98 is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:57 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
SVI30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 655
KS is a piezo-electric material, similar to ceramic. So you will not get anything on an ohm meter. The buzzer in a watch is made with the same material but function is just the reverse of a KS.
SVI30 is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:03 PM
  #8  
No more Maximas...
iTrader: (26)
 
pmohr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Oak Ridge, TN
Posts: 14,331
Originally Posted by SVI30
KS is a piezo-electric material, similar to ceramic. So you will not get anything on an ohm meter.
Hmm, and yet the holy grail itself tells us:



...I'd rather err on the side of Nissan, myself. Given that many many a person here have tested the KS with an ohmmeter and gotten an actual reading, I'd have to say that you're wrong. You will show resistance between the KS pin on the subharness and ground (assuming everything is as it's supposed to be).

Last edited by pmohr; 04-15-2008 at 04:27 PM.
pmohr is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:36 PM
  #9  
i has college
iTrader: (11)
 
EnervinE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: KCMO-ish
Posts: 1,367
You're not using an ohmmeter that can read that continuity. The ohmmeter we had sitting around did the same thing; turns out it couldn't read that range.
EnervinE is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 08:19 PM
  #10  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
OnEBadAsSi30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 341
A knock sensor doesn't set off the CEL its wire harness that sets it off becuase it recognizes that theyre is nothing there if the wire is corroded or cut.
OnEBadAsSi30 is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 08:55 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
BlackMaxdout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 497
Originally Posted by OnEBadAsSi30
A knock sensor doesn't set off the CEL its wire harness that sets it off becuase it recognizes that theyre is nothing there if the wire is corroded or cut.
what? The ECU cycles through the different sensors every time the car starts up. If it finds one that isn't within operating spec, it throws a code. A bad KS itself will throw a code.

If you have a multi-meter that will read a resistance that high, and you get zero resistance, then yes, the KS is bad. Just go out and buy the $0.99 resistor that fools the ECU into thinking you have a good KS. Someone help me out here...is it 560K ohms? Just make sure you reset the ECU to clear the code, and ONLY run premium gas...even though gas prices aren't going down.
BlackMaxdout is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 09:32 PM
  #12  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
OnEBadAsSi30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 341
Originally Posted by BlackMaxdout
what? The ECU cycles through the different sensors every time the car starts up. If it finds one that isn't within operating spec, it throws a code. A bad KS itself will throw a code.

If you have a multi-meter that will read a resistance that high, and you get zero resistance, then yes, the KS is bad. Just go out and buy the $0.99 resistor that fools the ECU into thinking you have a good KS. Someone help me out here...is it 560K ohms? Just make sure you reset the ECU to clear the code, and ONLY run premium gas...even though gas prices aren't going down.


Okay then do this for me.....Go take the 10mm bolt out of your CKPS in front of your block. Dangle the sensor in front of the block. Try to start the car. IT wont start it will only crank but the car WONT throw a code becuase the car recognizes that the sensor is there but its not reading anything. A sensor can be out of spec and still work. I had a bad crank ref. sensor by the rules on the FSM but it still worked. The ECM automactically detects knock and backs off timing giving you horrible gas mileage and a huge loss in power. So go ahead and while the engine is running take an extension and hit the KS sensor. The car will automatically back off timing so the car wont knock. It won't throw a code. Now undo the KS harness and start the car. The car will start fine and run fine but it WILL throw a code because it's not there. My KS was "bad" even though it ohmed out outside of what the FSM said it should be. But my car gets 28 mpg and starts and runs just fine.
OnEBadAsSi30 is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 10:03 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
MOHFpro90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 4,717
Originally Posted by vilmaxima
knock sensor resistance is very high(use an ohmeter capable of measuring at least 10 M-ohms) check for continuity between 2 terminals of the knock sensor connector. Continuity should be indicated, if an open circuit is indicated, replace the knock sensor.
Got this from Haynes Repair Manual.
Thanks, thats what I read in the stickies. I try to read them before asking a question. Not trying to be offensive at all man, but I come as prepared as possible. Thanks for the info though.

Originally Posted by pmohr


1, are you getting infinite or no resistance? i.e. 0 or 1?

What resistance range are you testing with, if not an auto-ranging DVOM? If you keep getting infinite, keep upping the test range. If you get no resistance, it's shorted somewhere, not likely internally so somewhere close. Of course, your meter could be shorted internally, too.
I went up to 20Mohms. I still got nothing(displayed OL, overload). Meter isnt shorted, it reads my gnd resistance fine.

Originally Posted by UncleMax98
Only one connector pin goes to the knock sensor. The other pin is a shield wire and is not connected to the knock sensor at the end. If you measure resistance between two connector pins, you will get infinite resistance. You can measure resistance between the pin and ground. One pin should be infinite resistance. The other pin should be around 525K Ohm. Note: Could be a bad cable, too.
I already mentioned neither pin gave me a reading. And again, I read the stickies.

Cable is good, thanks for the idea though.

Originally Posted by EnervinE
You're not using an ohmmeter that can read that continuity. The ohmmeter we had sitting around did the same thing; turns out it couldn't read that range.
Isnt 20Mohms enough? 20 million ohms? Or am I seeing something wrong?

Thanks guys.

Last edited by MOHFpro90; 11-27-2007 at 10:06 PM.
MOHFpro90 is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:38 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
BlackMaxdout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 497
Originally Posted by OnEBadAsSi30
Okay then do this for me.....Go take the 10mm bolt out of your CKPS in front of your block. Dangle the sensor in front of the block. Try to start the car. IT wont start it will only crank but the car WONT throw a code becuase the car recognizes that the sensor is there but its not reading anything.
You're wrong again. It's a piezoelectric device, which means that the right torque is required to put the sensor within operating spec when bolted to the engine. When you unbolt it like you said, that torque spec disappears. And yes, it WILL throw a code, because it's not testing to see if the KS is "there", it's testing to see if it's getting the right resistance from it during startup. When the resistance changes from knocking, then ignition is retarded.
BlackMaxdout is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:23 PM
  #15  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
OnEBadAsSi30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 341
Okay then how come when I was doing my swap I threw a knock sensor code becuase I ripped apart the harness. But when I fixed it...It went away? But when I took out the sensor, and kept the harness plugged in I didn't throw a code. Same with the CKPS. I took it totally out. I threw a code for it. I plugged it back in and it went away. Can you try to explain that one?
OnEBadAsSi30 is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:08 PM
  #16  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
Your car is special and does not comply with the other 4th gen rules. With that said, I have chocolate chip, vanilla, and peanut butter, take your choice.
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:09 PM
  #17  
Newbie - Just Registered
 
arpangurjar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14
I am trying to test mine too, another method I have heard of is just disconnect and see if it makes a difference, if it dosent that means the sensor is bad, if it does the sensor is good.

Although I find this very crude method, might just work, at least it dosent harm the car for sure.
arpangurjar is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:59 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
SVI30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 655
Originally Posted by BlackMaxdout
You're wrong again. It's a piezoelectric device, which means that the right torque is required to put the sensor within operating spec when bolted to the engine. When you unbolt it like you said, that torque spec disappears. And yes, it WILL throw a code, because it's not testing to see if the KS is "there", it's testing to see if it's getting the right resistance from it during startup. When the resistance changes from knocking, then ignition is retarded.
The ECU is not looking for the resistance but the waveforms from the KS.

The piezoelectric material in the KS will generate a waveform when mounted on the engine and the engine is running. It transforms mechanical vibration into a voltage swing. So the ECU is looking for this waveform at startup. When knocking happens, the larger vibration translates into a larger waveform. The ECU input can detect the waveform voltage differences between a running engine and a running engine with pre-ignition occurring.

Conversely, if a waveform is applied to the piezoelectric material, it will transform this electrical energy to mechanical movement. That's how buzzers work, like the back-up warning beepers on trucks.
SVI30 is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 04:56 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
BlackMaxdout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 497
Originally Posted by SVI30
The ECU is not looking for the resistance but the waveforms from the KS.
Just out of curiosity, do you mean like a frequency waveform?

One of the only other sensors that I know of that creates a frequency waveform is GM MAFS. I know first hand, since I tried to use (and did, successfully) in my undergraduate project when I was in school. It was an air flowbench, and thanks to that MAF, it was damn near impossible to calibrate. I know, I know, this isn't 4th gen related.

Edit: For people who like to learn:
http://www.picotech.com/auto/articles/knock-sensor.html

Last edited by BlackMaxdout; 11-28-2007 at 05:02 PM.
BlackMaxdout is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 09:04 PM
  #20  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
Originally Posted by BlackMaxdout
Just out of curiosity, do you mean like a frequency waveform?


One of the only other sensors that I know of that creates a frequency waveform is GM MAFS. I know first hand, since I tried to use (and did, successfully) in my undergraduate project when I was in school. It was an air flowbench, and thanks to that MAF, it was damn near impossible to calibrate. I know, I know, this isn't 4th gen related.

Edit: For people who like to learn:
http://www.picotech.com/auto/articles/knock-sensor.html
MAF, frequency? No, MAF = voltage, not hertz. CPS = freq, VSS, RPM. We've been through this before, and I told you that the GM/s is not linear to V. Therefore it's not a good calibration standard.

Unless you share/plot the gm/s WRT RPM.

Last edited by NmexMAX; 11-28-2007 at 09:14 PM.
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 11-29-2007, 12:12 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
SVI30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 655
Originally Posted by BlackMaxdout
Just out of curiosity, do you mean like a frequency waveform?

One of the only other sensors that I know of that creates a frequency waveform is GM MAFS. I know first hand, since I tried to use (and did, successfully) in my undergraduate project when I was in school. It was an air flowbench, and thanks to that MAF, it was damn near impossible to calibrate. I know, I know, this isn't 4th gen related.

Edit: For people who like to learn:
http://www.picotech.com/auto/articles/knock-sensor.html
Yes, 4G MAF outputs a voltage. That GM MAF uses a multi-vibrator and the frequency change is controlled by a resistor placed in the airflow. This resistor is on the film and heated. The increase in airflow reduce the resistor temperature and changes the resistance. Then the output frequency of the multi-vibrator changes.

Added:
The KS output is not a regular waveform. I do have some examples but no good place to post it. Since it is sensing cylinders firing, the frequency is tied to RPM. But the KS is not a perfect sensor, so the output looks like noise. Waveform of engine knocking looks like bigger noise.

Last edited by SVI30; 11-29-2007 at 11:43 AM.
SVI30 is offline  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:17 AM
  #22  
Member
 
lexoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 73
Originally Posted by SVI30
The ECU is not looking for the resistance but the waveforms from the KS.
You are right and wrong at the same time Vibrations from the engine and engine knocking is transformed by KS (which is a piezoelectric element) into voltage. On the other hand, inside KS there's a resistance about 560 Ohms connected to the piezoelectric element. In this way ECU can check circuit to the KS telling that it is not open or shorted.
lexoid is offline  
Old 11-29-2007, 08:13 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
SVI30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 655
Originally Posted by lexoid
You are right and wrong at the same time Vibrations from the engine and engine knocking is transformed by KS (which is a piezoelectric element) into voltage. On the other hand, inside KS there's a resistance about 560 Ohms connected to the piezoelectric element. In this way ECU can check circuit to the KS telling that it is not open or shorted.
That's interesting. Is this 560ohm resistor in series or in parallel to the piezoelectric element?

Added:
I just read the hyperlink in Post #19. That KS design has a 560 ohm resistor for diagnostic purposes. However, since it is in parallel to the KS, when measured with an ohm meter; meter will read 560 ohm since the KS itself is high impedance (almost like open).

The KS design in our 4G reads high impedance on a meter. So this KS doesn't have the parallel 560 ohm resistor inside.

I venture to guess the Nissan ECU looks for a waveform at startup to determine whether the KS is working instead of checking continuity via the parallel resistor.

For our engine, it is very convenient to have a oscilloscope on hand. For that, I have a cheap used scope at home originally bought to work on that GM MAF.

Last edited by SVI30; 11-29-2007 at 11:36 AM.
SVI30 is offline  
Old 11-29-2007, 03:42 PM
  #24  
Newbie - Just Registered
 
arpangurjar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14
So I decide to test my KS and its MUTILATED

I also am getting horrible milage, so I decided to test the KS by getting it out.

I wish I could post pictures but I guess i dont have rights, I am waiting, I removed my KS outside the car, and its cracked from more than 2 places.

But the thing is,I tried testing it using an ohm meter, and the 2nd pin reads 550 Ohms with it grounded to the engine block, and there is connectivinty on the 1st pin.

Now it looks like its been run over a car, but the resistances is being read, am I to assume that its ok ? I check the resistance between pin 1 and 2 and its also 550 ohms.

Can anyone check the resistance between pin 1 and 2 and tell me what it is?

I would really appreciate it.
arpangurjar is offline  
Old 11-29-2007, 06:57 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
BlackMaxdout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 497
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
MAF, frequency? No, MAF = voltage, not hertz. CPS = freq, VSS, RPM. We've been through this before, and I told you that the GM/s is not linear to V. Therefore it's not a good calibration standard.

Unless you share/plot the gm/s WRT RPM.
GM mafs DO output frequency....

We worked around the general motors MAF though. We ended up hooking it to a DSM MAF translater, then setting the offset to zero. Plus we had software that would do fast fourier transforms for us. Bingo.
BlackMaxdout is offline  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:01 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
BlackMaxdout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 497
Originally Posted by SVI30
Yes, 4G MAF outputs a voltage. That GM MAF uses a multi-vibrator and the frequency change is controlled by a resistor placed in the airflow. This resistor is on the film and heated. The increase in airflow reduce the resistor temperature and changes the resistance. Then the output frequency of the multi-vibrator changes.
Didn't know about the multi-vibrator, but we were well aware of the heated element design. Our advisor was an engineer for GM back in the day.

Are you by chance a fellow engineer, mechanic, etc? You seem to know your stuff.
BlackMaxdout is offline  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:06 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
BlackMaxdout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 497
Originally Posted by SVI30
The KS design in our 4G reads high impedance on a meter. So this KS doesn't have the parallel 560 ohm resistor inside.
Are you sure? There's a "mod" to get rid of the knock sensor completely by simply plugging a 560K ohm resistor into the female end of the connector...

I've done it, and it successfully prevented code 0304 from ever coming back, so I'm assuming it works.
BlackMaxdout is offline  
Old 11-29-2007, 08:41 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
SVI30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 655
Originally Posted by BlackMaxdout
Didn't know about the multi-vibrator, but we were well aware of the heated element design. Our advisor was an engineer for GM back in the day.

Are you by chance a fellow engineer, mechanic, etc? You seem to know your stuff.
Yes, used piezo buzzers while designing watches years ago. Made an injector tester while working on that GM car. Now working on lasers and wireless semiconductors for money. But working on cars is still my joy, all seven of them, no Honda and BMWs. Many guys here still put me to shame.
SVI30 is offline  
Old 12-27-2007, 12:17 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
SVI30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 655
Originally Posted by SVI30
...

Added:
The KS output is not a regular waveform. I do have some examples but no good place to post it. Since it is sensing cylinders firing, the frequency is tied to RPM. But the KS is not a perfect sensor, so the output looks like noise. Waveform of engine knocking looks like bigger noise.
I found a web host for pix. Here are some material on what a KS output waveform looks like.




Note: ECM not only control timing but enrich the fuel mixture also to eliminate knock. So when knocking is present, gas mileage may suffer. Then running 87 octane may not pay. Best is to try a few tanks of different octane under same running conditions and see which one yields the best mileage.

Last edited by SVI30; 12-27-2007 at 12:24 PM.
SVI30 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmlee44
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
8
10-02-2022 02:13 PM
mkaresh
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
21
03-12-2018 06:48 PM
maxinout93
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
10-31-2015 02:04 AM



Quick Reply: KS not reading any resistance at all?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:30 PM.