question about coilovers
#1
question about coilovers
okay.. so i know that they dont make coilovers for the third gen and that even if u could put coilovers in the max.. they wouldnt work.. this is the part im asking about..
why would the coilovers fail? is there anyway to fix that?
why would the coilovers fail? is there anyway to fix that?
#3
what's so different about a 4th gen vs a 3rd gen? same front suspension design... rear is different obviously but the weight distribution is basically the same..
or are you talking about sleeve-overs over the stock struts?
or are you talking about sleeve-overs over the stock struts?
#4
the rear strut housing isn't designed to accommodate a coil-over setup, due to the lower spring perch. The problem lies less with the strut, more the housing. I believe what Matt, or Jeff meant was the stock struts aren't designed to take the abuse of normal driving, when lowered that much. I wouldn't be worried about blowing a strut (think about a koni strut + sprint spring@2 inch drop: about what a coil over would net you).
#6
IIRC Matt said since the struts are so short, it doesn't allow a full range of motion, I guess making the struts sort of semi perma-compressed (especially if you had coilovers and dialed it down pretty low), which blows them out quick
#7
okay.. hold on.. first of all.. let me be a noob for a sec. and ask if we are on the same page.. im talking about putting in coilovers to replace the whole spring and shock set up.. where does the strut come back into play?
#8
I don't see why one couldn't sort of just do a "body drop" on it by adding an inch or two of length into the strut towers. Then it'd be low(er) and still ride smooth, kind of like what alot of hot rods do. If I trusted my welding skills to **** around with the strut towers, I'd try it out. But in theory, I see absolutely no reason it wouldn't work. You'd just have to be careful about keeping the same geometry/angle on the towers.
#9
James: oic... I stand corrected, and concede the point.
hamtaro:
the back strut is actually an insert. there is nowere to replace the rear strut, and coil,
with out hacking the stock one apart.
ignore any site that says 89-95 maxima coilovers. they aren't for the j30 maxima; they are for the a31 maxima (not a US car).
hamtaro:
the back strut is actually an insert. there is nowere to replace the rear strut, and coil,
with out hacking the stock one apart.
ignore any site that says 89-95 maxima coilovers. they aren't for the j30 maxima; they are for the a31 maxima (not a US car).
#10
Again, this is just what I *think* I remember from what Matt said. He'll probably come clear all this up himself, though
#11
James: oic... I stand corrected, and concede the point.
hamtaro:
the back strut is actually an insert. there is nowere to replace the rear strut, and coil,
with out hacking the stock one apart.
ignore any site that says 89-95 maxima coilovers. they aren't for the j30 maxima; they are for the a31 maxima (not a US car).
hamtaro:
the back strut is actually an insert. there is nowere to replace the rear strut, and coil,
with out hacking the stock one apart.
ignore any site that says 89-95 maxima coilovers. they aren't for the j30 maxima; they are for the a31 maxima (not a US car).
so just t get this straight.. the rear strut hangs down? it dosent bolt up like the front?
#12
no.. sort of...
the front has a seperate hub assembly. the rear has an integrated strut tube (where the strut insert goes) and hub assembly, in one piece.
both bolt to the top in a similar fashion.
the front has a seperate hub assembly. the rear has an integrated strut tube (where the strut insert goes) and hub assembly, in one piece.
both bolt to the top in a similar fashion.
#13
I don't see why one couldn't sort of just do a "body drop" on it by adding an inch or two of length into the strut towers. Then it'd be low(er) and still ride smooth, kind of like what alot of hot rods do. If I trusted my welding skills to **** around with the strut towers, I'd try it out. But in theory, I see absolutely no reason it wouldn't work. You'd just have to be careful about keeping the same geometry/angle on the towers.
but for a maxima you would need something that was designed for the nose-heavy weight distribution of FWD cars. z31 is 50/50 front/rear, maximas are more like 60/40
Last edited by CapedCadaver; 02-16-2010 at 02:54 PM.
#14
okay.. so when you swap rear breaks for disks. could u overcome the problem of the strut and hub being one assembly by swaping hubs?
#15
aside from the bolt pattern for drum/disk, they are identical (they may be the same in that aspect, as well). something we may consider is caped's post aove yours (not sure how practical it would be).
#16
z31 people just cut the tube and weld some-other-car's coilover (usually S13) into the tube, up front. the 3rd gen rear strut is actually REALLY similar to the z31's front strut design. the tierod doesn't actually attach directly to the strut either, it attaches to a small "knuckle arm" that bolts into the bottom of the strut/spindle assembly.
but for a maxima you would need something that was designed for the nose-heavy weight distribution of FWD cars. z31 is 50/50 front/rear, maximas are more like 60/40
but for a maxima you would need something that was designed for the nose-heavy weight distribution of FWD cars. z31 is 50/50 front/rear, maximas are more like 60/40
so you can put coilovers on a maxima after all.. what were ppl talking about the strut blowing out?
#17
in this first pic.. you see the bottom of the strut/spindle assembly, with the hub removed. the difference between drum and disc struts is JUST the bolt pattern for the 4 bolt holes that hold the caliper adapter plate or drum adapter plate. the "hub" (the thing your wheel bolts onto) is the same regardless what type of brakes you have.. only difference being it has the notched ring on it for ABS.
this pic shows the whole spring/strut setup. as you can see there's nothing to "swap"
#18
"can" is debatable. nobody's actually done it before because it isn't worth the time, money, effort etc to cut and weld strut tubes on a nose-heavy FWD sedan especially when you don't know exactly what car's coilover you would want to be welding on. and even then i don't know if 4th gen fronts are a direct bolt-on or not. it's entirely possible that they aren't.
#19
yeah... your right. ive never really looked at that.. but hey.. thats why im on here gettin schooled..
those pics rele help.
so one last question then.
to lower the car, you want new struts and spring. right? okay
so according to that picture the rear strut is one piece with the hub assembly.
how would u get a new strut in there?
#20
haha
yeah... your right. ive never really looked at that.. but hey.. thats why im on here gettin schooled..
those pics rele help.
so one last question then.
to lower the car, you want new struts and spring. right? okay
so according to that picture the rear strut is one piece with the hub assembly.
how would u get a new strut in there?
yeah... your right. ive never really looked at that.. but hey.. thats why im on here gettin schooled..
those pics rele help.
so one last question then.
to lower the car, you want new struts and spring. right? okay
so according to that picture the rear strut is one piece with the hub assembly.
how would u get a new strut in there?
if you want the car lower, get drop springs (eibachs are the best in terms of not totally ruining your suspension geometry) and stiffer struts (tokico or koni)
#22
(witholding long rant about auto engineers not knowing how working on cars works...)
#23
How frequently, though, does one perform maintenance on the rear hub assembly. I had no need to swap the rear bearings when I had to swap out the front and the alignment shop told me, even after I replaced all the rear bushings and shocks, that the rear didn't need adjusting ( I don't think it had much to do with me, just the simplicity of the design). I think it's a pretty solid design, but if this car weren't FWD, that may not be the case. The cost to have the bearings pressed in and out on top of the cost for parts would come close, but not over the price of the hub assemblies. Gonna look it up now to see.......
*edit* ~85 for rear hub assemblies
last time I had bearings put in, it cost me ~35 for each bearing and ~40 to have them pressed in. so for ~60 more one could swap the rear hubs.............. My memory fades with thought.
I am usually cursing the engineers with you Ben, but sometimes I am considerate of their intentions. Unless it's a Ford or BMW, then I sound like a drunken sailor from New York.
*edit* ~85 for rear hub assemblies
last time I had bearings put in, it cost me ~35 for each bearing and ~40 to have them pressed in. so for ~60 more one could swap the rear hubs.............. My memory fades with thought.
I am usually cursing the engineers with you Ben, but sometimes I am considerate of their intentions. Unless it's a Ford or BMW, then I sound like a drunken sailor from New York.
Last edited by ve30max; 02-17-2010 at 06:45 AM.
#24
How frequently, though, does one perform maintenance on the rear hub assembly. I had no need to swap the rear bearings when I had to swap out the front and the alignment shop told me, even after I replaced all the rear bushings and shocks, that the rear didn't need adjusting ( I don't think it had much to do with me, just the simplicity of the design). I think it's a pretty solid design, but if this car weren't FWD, that may not be the case. The cost to have the bearings pressed in and out on top of the cost for parts would come close, but not over the price of the hub assemblies. Gonna look it up now to see.......
*edit* ~85 for rear hub assemblies
last time I had bearings put in, it cost me ~35 for each bearing and ~40 to have them pressed in. so for ~60 more one could swap the rear hubs.............. My memory fades with thought.
I am usually cursing the engineers with you Ben, but sometimes I am considerate of their intentions. Unless it's a Ford or BMW, then I sound like a drunken sailor from New York.
*edit* ~85 for rear hub assemblies
last time I had bearings put in, it cost me ~35 for each bearing and ~40 to have them pressed in. so for ~60 more one could swap the rear hubs.............. My memory fades with thought.
I am usually cursing the engineers with you Ben, but sometimes I am considerate of their intentions. Unless it's a Ford or BMW, then I sound like a drunken sailor from New York.
my point was that the OP was asking about "swapping the rear hubs" to "make the struts not blow" or something which made no sense and showed he needed to understand the layout of the suspension before trying to do crazy ish to it.
#25
I understood you bro, I was just providing insight to why I thought the engineers designed the rear setup the way they did, and further explained how it wasn't hard to replace the rear hubs, nor is it that much more expensive. I am sorry, I re-read my post and did think it wasn't clear that I was comparing the cost of repairing the style of the front setup, which would require bearings to be pressed in and out, vs. the cost of replacing the rear, fully assembled, hubs.......... this thread is useless, I shall unsubscribe to alleviate my concerns over topics well described in other threads.
#26
#27
#28
so does this mean that 4th gen front coils will fit right in?
#29
No.. 4th gen suspension won't fit on a 3 gen.
The 3 gen has the godawful shortest front strut known to man. I put coilovers on mine about 10 years ago and have had problems with them ever since. You simply can't:
1. get enough strut travel, even with modified upper mounts that give an extra 1" of travel. Even with modified (shortened) Konis, I would blow the front struts about once a year.
2. get a strut with enough damping to work with the stiff springs you need to make the car handle.
3. correct the front suspension geometry to overcome the 4x4 family car design and make the car handle properly.
you can build or make anything you want- it just won't work that well unless you spend some BIG bucks and go to a Koni 8610 or 8611 race shock. Ready to spend $3500 on a suspension?
The 3 gen has the godawful shortest front strut known to man. I put coilovers on mine about 10 years ago and have had problems with them ever since. You simply can't:
1. get enough strut travel, even with modified upper mounts that give an extra 1" of travel. Even with modified (shortened) Konis, I would blow the front struts about once a year.
2. get a strut with enough damping to work with the stiff springs you need to make the car handle.
3. correct the front suspension geometry to overcome the 4x4 family car design and make the car handle properly.
you can build or make anything you want- it just won't work that well unless you spend some BIG bucks and go to a Koni 8610 or 8611 race shock. Ready to spend $3500 on a suspension?
Last edited by Matt93SE; 02-27-2010 at 08:06 PM.
#30
Anyways, as being a second year student of B.Mech, and the knowledge i have to date, it is possible to put coil overs on 3rd gen but with some really intense research and alot of money if u wanna do it the RIGHT way...but, i would just lower it with koni and eibhac and whatever, and call it a day. I wouldn't try to play with the Laws of Physics unless you really know what your are doing, consequences could be very bad on high speed driving....but as Matt said...if u wanna spend big bucks and have the passion then why not?....
#33
Came across this the other day haha this guy from Melbourne, UN has some coilovers custom made to fit on the 3rd gen. I think he's the only one thats done it... idk but to me its not worth all the trouble.
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/515618
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/515618
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Unclejunebug
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
04-02-2016 05:42 AM
Kyle Lee Cleveland
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
1
09-28-2015 09:01 PM