3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994) Learn more about the 3rd Generation Maxima here.

Odd Noise After Timing Belt Job

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2008, 01:04 AM
  #41  
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
CapedCadaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central NC
Posts: 43,324
Originally Posted by LvR
Let me state the obvious and incur the wrath of the community:

This is not a job to experiment with - you either do it right or you don't do it at all.

A loose belt will at best allow you to retention it if nothing has happened - at worst it will jump a tooth or more or even come right off requiring an engine replacement at this age.

A too tight belt will at best allow you to slack off on the tension if nothing happened and it was only noisy - at worst the belt itself can break or more likely the nose of the crank can be broken right off (see the huge number of threads on this topic here already) also requiring an engine replacement.

Don't F**k around with this - if you are lucky to have a motor still running with an improperly adjusted belt and didn't understand the manual the first time round, make damn sure you do it right the second time round by removing the covers and following the manual - the fact that you guys are asking all sorts of funky questions leads me to believe any other method is bound to end in misery as a result of inexperience.
to be honest, i didn't actually do this by the FSM (except the torque spec on the locknut). I just put the belt on the same way my uncle did on my car.. i never saw them use any sort of force-measuring device so i didn't use one either. as far funky questions... well, wiking has some funky methods, but most of the time his endeavours are successful so i wanted to be sure i understood what he was saying. But given that i'm 99% sure i'm going to have to re-tighten the belt anyhow, yea, i'll pull the covers. It just figures that the one time i underestimate the necessary level of precision of something is the one time i pick the WRONG thing to underestimate.
CapedCadaver is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 01:10 AM
  #42  
LvR
Senior Member
 
LvR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pretoria - South Africa
Posts: 1,205
Absolutely nothing wrong with Wiking's suggestions either here or elsewhere - IF AND WHEN YOU UNDERSTAND THE OPERATION AND INTERACTION OF ALL THE MECHANICALS INVOLVED - I use many of the same methods to save time, but experience and understanding the implications of one's actions plays a huge role here.
LvR is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 01:17 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Wiking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: EU Scandinavia
Posts: 4,323
Originally Posted by CapedCadaver
to be honest, i didn't actually do this by the FSM (except the torque spec on the locknut). I just put the belt on the same way my uncle did on my car.. i never saw them use any sort of force-measuring device so i didn't use one either. as far funky questions... well, wiking has some funky methods, but most of the time his endeavours are successful so i wanted to be sure i understood what he was saying. But given that i'm 99% sure i'm going to have to re-tighten the belt anyhow, yea, i'll pull the covers. It just figures that the one time i underestimate the necessary level of precision of something is the one time i pick the WRONG thing to underestimate.
Now pls tell me which 'method' is funky? A belt tightening becomes only an issue when observed via bottle bottom...

Tension checkup; if one cant do that just prying the cover top, then its best to let others tow it to stealership for the teens.
Wiking is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 06:51 AM
  #44  
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Matt93SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 18,095
Wikings methods on the timing belt are spot-on. I've been doing timing belts for 15 years and that's the way I do them too. that's how a very experienced mechanic (and well qualified- not just a hack shop grease monkey) taught me, showing me the FSM for some other vehicles while he was doing it.

Belt tension checks are pretty much an industry standard. Nissan has some other strange methods of checking the tension, but this method works 100% of the time.


And also as he said, timing belts are NOT something to "learn on". If you've never done one, have someone that has help you through it. This is not a place to screw up. the potential risk is days of labor and hundreds or thousands of $ in repair costs to replace the engine. If you're lucky you *might* be able to rebuild, but 12 valves at $25 each + head gaskets + head job + valve guides + etc etc etc = about $900 for a cheapie rebuild.

That's a lotta hassles because you weren't sure of what you're doing.
Matt93SE is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 10:02 AM
  #45  
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
CapedCadaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central NC
Posts: 43,324
Originally Posted by Wiking
Now pls tell me which 'method' is funky? A belt tightening becomes only an issue when observed via bottle bottom...

Tension checkup; if one cant do that just prying the cover top, then its best to let others tow it to stealership for the teens.
i just thought it a bit 'funky' to check the tension without removing the cover. but being that you actually have a fixed reference point (top of the cover), that lets you be even more precise than you would have with the covers off, in terms of measuring deflection.

Originally Posted by Matt93SE
Wikings methods on the timing belt are spot-on. I've been doing timing belts for 15 years and that's the way I do them too. that's how a very experienced mechanic (and well qualified- not just a hack shop grease monkey) taught me, showing me the FSM for some other vehicles while he was doing it.

Belt tension checks are pretty much an industry standard. Nissan has some other strange methods of checking the tension, but this method works 100% of the time.


And also as he said, timing belts are NOT something to "learn on". If you've never done one, have someone that has help you through it. This is not a place to screw up. the potential risk is days of labor and hundreds or thousands of $ in repair costs to replace the engine. If you're lucky you *might* be able to rebuild, but 12 valves at $25 each + head gaskets + head job + valve guides + etc etc etc = about $900 for a cheapie rebuild.

That's a lotta hassles because you weren't sure of what you're doing.
well the motor hasn't shown any signs of trouble so far. he's been driving it since september like that...so i guess 6-8k miles. Depending how smoothly things go on thursday and friday, i should be able to have him come over here and i can fix the tension, no harm no foul.

I did watch someone else do one before (actually it was on my car, in mid-2007 before i was brave enough to perform tasks like this), but either they didn't check the tension, or i just wasn't looking when they did.
CapedCadaver is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 07:42 PM
  #46  
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
CapedCadaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central NC
Posts: 43,324
yes i know this is an old thread BUT this is relevant to the argument that was going back and forth in this thread wrt how to tension the belt correctly... i've actually discovered that the square-tooth (89-early 93) belt has a very different procedure for setting the tension than the round-tooth (93.5-94) belt... so that might be pretty important whenever changing one's belt.

square tooth (start on EM-9) http://www.nico[removethis]club.com/FSM/300zx/1986/em.pdf

round tooth (start on EM-15) http://www.nico[removethis]club.com/FSM/maxima/1994/em.pdf

Last edited by CapedCadaver; 04-27-2011 at 08:00 PM.
CapedCadaver is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 10:22 AM
  #47  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
maxitech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,306
I used the round-tooth procedure, since that is from the free PDF version of the FSM (which is for a 94) online.

The other link you posted is for a 1986 Z. It MAY or may not be the same way you install a square-tooth belt on a Maxi. The only way to be sure is to dig up a copy of an earlier MAXIMA manual and compare.
maxitech is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 12:38 PM
  #48  
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
CapedCadaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central NC
Posts: 43,324
Originally Posted by maxitech
I used the round-tooth procedure, since that is from the free PDF version of the FSM (which is for a 94) online.

The other link you posted is for a 1986 Z. It MAY or may not be the same way you install a square-tooth belt on a Maxi. The only way to be sure is to dig up a copy of an earlier MAXIMA manual and compare.
this is true, but i don't see why anything other than the belt type would make a difference... cuz the engines (as i'm actually in the process of doing) are interswappable between a Z31 and a J30 Maxima. The only other thing i can figure is that they just updated the procedure regardless of belt type, due to some newer conventional wisdom about how belts are supposed to be installed.

Fortunately benstoked has one of those old paper FSM's from 91 or something.
CapedCadaver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tsi6001
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
12
10-03-2022 10:23 PM
CorollaULEV
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
30
08-09-2021 08:11 PM
PH98I30
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
19
06-13-2016 02:38 PM
Ray229Harris
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
10
09-16-2015 08:16 PM
Hondarydr
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
4
09-08-2015 03:13 PM



Quick Reply: Odd Noise After Timing Belt Job



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:13 AM.